<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Betsy Devine: Funny ha-ha and/or funny peculiar &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betsydevine.com/blog/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog</link>
	<description>Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The blind leading the Democrats</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2010/02/07/the-blind-leading-the-democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2010/02/07/the-blind-leading-the-democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wide wonderful world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/2010/02/07/the-blind-leading-the-democrats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Snow-covered lion on Columbia campus

Originally uploaded by betsythedevine


&#8220;Not one dime! Not until Democrats pass healthcare.&#8221; 
That is what DNC fundraisers who call our house are going to hear from now on. 
The hacks and jackasses in Washington who took over the Democratic National Committee from Howard Dean have taken us right back to their old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/betsythedevine/71897857/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/20/71897857_c161f79887_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/betsythedevine/71897857/">Snow-covered lion on Columbia campus</a><br />
<br />
Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/betsythedevine/">betsythedevine</a><br />
</span>
</div>
<p>&#8220;Not one dime! Not until Democrats pass healthcare.&#8221; </p>
<p>That is what DNC fundraisers who call our house are going to hear from now on. </p>
<p>The hacks and jackasses in Washington who took over the Democratic National Committee from Howard Dean have taken us right back to their old election-losing &#8220;centrist&#8221; techniques. Under Dean&#8217;s leadership, we witnessed the landslide election of Barack Obama and  Democratic majorities in both the House and the Senate. All that advantage has been nearly frittered away. </p>
<p>Obama has spent the past year trying to engage Republicans in bipartisan governance. It&#8217;s been like a year of watching Charlie Brown trying to kick a football with Lucy&#8217;s &#8220;assistance.&#8221; </p>
<p>And when Massachusetts voters, one year after Obama&#8217;s landslide victory,  re-fill Ted Kennedy&#8217;s Senate seat with a Republican? Surely something is very, very wrong. Let me just quote <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/01/19/dean_time_for_democrats_to_get_tough.html">Howard Dean</a> on what that something is:<br />
<blockquote>If you want to win, you actually can&#8217;t sort of move to the middle and become a Republican. You&#8217;ve got to stand up and stand for the things that you got elected on and that the Democratic Party believes in and we haven&#8217;t seen that in the healthcare bill and I think that&#8217;s part of the problem.</p></blockquote>
<p>The smartest thing Obama could do now, in my unhumble opinion, would be to beg Howard Dean to come back and run the DNC.</p>
<p>Update: Somebody on Daily Kos had a great suggestion about this issue: Make your own list of good progressive candidates. When you get particularly annoyed about something political, make that the occasion to send a donation to the next person on your own list.<br />
<br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2010/02/07/the-blind-leading-the-democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new and improved Big-Mac-Fat-Duck index</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/04/05/the-new-and-improved-big-mac-fat-duck-index/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/04/05/the-new-and-improved-big-mac-fat-duck-index/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wide wonderful world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/04/05/the-new-and-improved-big-mac-fat-duck-index/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



bigmac

Originally uploaded by uuuuuli


Four Big Macs per hour.
That&#8217;s what the average Dutch worker earns &#8212; although the Dutch 17 year-old working at McDonalds earns a mere 1.05 Big Macs per hour. 
Yes, the Big Mac Index (and its more elite rival, the Tall Latte Index) are semi-serious efforts to match wages to cost of living [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/raumfisch/2825765160/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3221/2825765160_51d993e0fc_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/raumfisch/2825765160/">bigmac</a><br />
<br />
Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/raumfisch/">uuuuuli</a><br />
</span>
</div>
<p>Four Big Macs per hour.</p>
<p><a href = "http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2009/03/the_dutch_earn_four_big_macs_a.php">That&#8217;s what the average Dutch worker earns</a> &#8212; although the Dutch 17 year-old working at McDonalds earns a mere 1.05 Big Macs per hour. </p>
<p>Yes, the <a href = "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Mac_Index">Big Mac Index</a> (and its more elite rival, the <a href = "http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/16/news/funny/latteindex/">Tall Latte Index</a>) are semi-serious efforts to match wages to cost of living in different countries.</p>
<p>Why not expand this to comparing cost of living across the lines of social class. Conservatives are outraged that US auto workers can earn 10 Big Macs per hour, but they seem quite content that <a href = "http://www.companypay.com/executive/compensation/general-motors-corp.asp?yr=2008">GM executives</a> get $3M to $14M per year.</p>
<p>This makes perfect sense, however, because GM executives do not eat Big Macs.  The relevant point of comparison should be something like dinner for one at Oxford&#8217;s <a href = "http://www.squaremeal.co.uk/restaurants/uk/view/82023/The_Fat_Duck">Fat Duck restaurant</a>, which costs $170.</p>
<p>The Big-Mac-Fat-Duck Index requires, then, paying the GM executive at least $1,700 per hour. If a GM executive puts in 50 weeks per year at 40 hours per week, that is 2,000 highly valuable executive hours they should expect to get fair pay for, which works out to at least $3.4M per year. </p>
<p>And this does not even count beverage, tip, or air fare from Detroit to the UK!</p>
<p>The executives who get even more than that are no doubt eating meals somewhere even more expensive.<br />
<br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/04/05/the-new-and-improved-big-mac-fat-duck-index/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is even worse than an oxymoron?</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/01/25/what-is-worse-than-oxymoron/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/01/25/what-is-worse-than-oxymoron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 03:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/?p=1779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Mission accomplished!&#8221; said Frank, over dinner tonight. We all looked at him. &#8220;It just doesn&#8217;t mean what it used to mean now, does it?&#8221; he said.
&#8220;Neither does &#8216;Heckuva job,&#8217;&#8221; pointed out someone else.
There should be a word, maybe something based on &#8220;oxymoron,&#8221; for expressions that used to mean &#8220;[something]&#8221; but now mean &#8220;[ha-ha-ha-NOT-something].&#8221; Heckuva job [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="float:right;margin:5px;padding:5px;"><a href="http://betsydevine.com/blog/pictures/BushSuit.jpg"><img alt="Bush in flight suit: &quot;Karl Rove told me to stick a sock in it.&quot;" src="http://betsydevine.com/blog/pictures/BushSuit.jpg" title="BushSuit" width="166" height="214" /></a></span>&#8220;<a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9803EFDC173EF935A25756C0A9659C8B63&#038;sec=&#038;spon=&#038;partner=permalink&#038;exprod=permalink">Mission accomplished!</a>&#8221; said <a href="http://frankwilczek.com/">Frank</a>, over dinner tonight. We all looked at him. &#8220;It just doesn&#8217;t mean what it used to mean now, does it?&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Neither does &#8216;<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/11/03/brown.fema.emails/">Heckuva job</a>,&#8217;&#8221; pointed out someone else.</p>
<p>There should be a word, maybe something based on &#8220;oxymoron,&#8221; for expressions that used to mean &#8220;[something]&#8221; but now mean &#8220;[ha-ha-ha-NOT-something].&#8221; Heckuva job on creating so many, Team Bush! </p>
<p>Since I&#8217;m suggesting it, maybe I should make up said word, but since nothing suggests itself I won&#8217;t. </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s OK, because what I will do is &#8220;<a href="http://betsydevine.com/blog/2007/06/19/pearls-of-pr-speak-when-bigshots-make-big-mistakes/">take full responsibility</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/01/25/what-is-worse-than-oxymoron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two screens are better than one</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/01/20/two-screens-are-better-than-one/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/01/20/two-screens-are-better-than-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wide wonderful world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/01/20/two-screens-are-better-than-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Two screens are better than one

Originally uploaded by betsythedevine


We just got a TV the day before Thanksgiving, after more than a decade without one. In the two months since then, we have probably watched a total of ten hours on it, about five of them 30 Rock. 
But watching the inauguration of Barack Obama on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/betsythedevine/3213577724/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3095/3213577724_217c740cfa_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/betsythedevine/3213577724/">Two screens are better than one</a><br />
<br />
Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/betsythedevine/">betsythedevine</a><br />
</span>
</div>
<p><a href = "http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/11/29/punkin-chunkin-expensive-but-priceless/">We just got a TV the day before Thanksgiving</a>, after more than a decade without one. In the two months since then, we have probably watched a total of ten hours on it, about five of them <i>30 Rock</i>. </p>
<p>But watching the inauguration of Barack Obama on CNNHD, <a href = "http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/01/19/theInteractiveLivingRoomOf.html">even with my laptop by my side</a>, I can see that TV gives a different and somehow communal experience of news events, quite unlike the hunt-and-peek solipsist patchwork of (for instance) my TV-less website surfing on Election night. </p>
<p>That effect isn&#8217;t necessarily benign. When 9/11 unfolded, <a href = "http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070413111636.htm">students who sat glued to TV for hours were more traumatized than those who talked with friends and family</a>. And how about the 2004 &#8220;Dean scream&#8221;? <a href = "http://betsydevine.com/blog/2004/02/04/the-britney-spears-penalty/">Played more than 700 times with shocked comments each time</a>, it emerged as the artifact of a crowd-blocking microphone, but not before torpedoing Howard Dean&#8217;s run for president.  </p>
<p>In Wikipedia, there&#8217;s a policy we call <i><a href = "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weight#Undue_weight">WEIGHT</a></i> &#8212; basically, an article should represent fairly all competing viewpoints, but without giving such undue weight to unusual views as to imply that these viewpoints are widely supported. In TV, there seems to be a policy that we might call DRAMA &#8212; for example, to give enormous over-weight to any person or event that generates exciting footage. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m sorry to be watching hour after hour of the inauguration of  Barack Obama. But I like it that I can keep working as I do so.<br />
<br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2009/01/20/two-screens-are-better-than-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, we could!</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/11/05/yes-we-could/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/11/05/yes-we-could/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cambridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wide wonderful world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/11/05/yes-we-could/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



We vote in the local fire house

Originally uploaded by betsythedevine


And yes, we did! Thank you, America, for electing Barack Obama.
I predict a new surge in American productivity, starting right NOW, as millions of us start to break our time-sucking addiction to political minute-by-minute analysis. 
In my case, starting tomorrow. You know, the Karl-Rovians have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/betsythedevine/3003527353/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3001/3003527353_82d13fbdec_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/betsythedevine/3003527353/">We vote in the local fire house</a><br />
<br />
Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/betsythedevine/">betsythedevine</a><br />
</span>
</div>
<p>And yes, we did! Thank you, America, for electing Barack Obama.</p>
<p>I predict a new surge in American productivity, starting right NOW, as millions of us start to break our time-sucking addiction to political minute-by-minute analysis. </p>
<p>In my case, starting tomorrow. You know, the Karl-Rovians have been running against me personally for so long &#8212; East Coast born and bred, married to a professor, driving a hybrid car, and supporting gay marriage&#8211;that it&#8217;s great to wake up and discover that America&#8217;s burning question is no longer whether the Democratic candidate might be a Marxist who wants Bin Ladin to bomb us and hates iceberg lettuce.</p>
<p>Could this finally be the end of the culture wars? The <a href = "http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122584338026799165.html">WSJ</a> seems to think Obama found the answer:</p>
<blockquote><p> What would beat the culture wars was always clear from the pseudo-populist language in which they were framed. In place of a showdown between a folksy &#8220;middle America&#8221; and a snobbish &#8220;liberal elite,&#8221; Democrats needed to offer the real deal &#8212; the conflict between a public that craves fairness and an economic system that enables the predatory.</p>
<p>&#8230;When your mortgage is under water and your neighbors are being laid off, the need to take up the sword against arrogant stem-cell scientists becomes considerably less urgent.</p>
<p>The Republican response, of course, was to double down on the righteous rhetoric of red-state grievance and spin the wheel one more time.</p></blockquote>
<p>It was sad to see John McCain sink down into the culture war Karl Rove dog whistle politics, like an old dog so thirsty he drinks water out of the toilet. I hope McCain is getting some sleep right now. Obama is the one with tough jobs ahead of him now, and I have more hope than is perhaps rational that he is going to be a great President.</p>
<p>Speaking of more sleep, I really need some more sleep too.<br />
<br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/11/05/yes-we-could/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fooled again: Your bailout billions at work</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/10/25/fooled-again-your-bailout-billions-at-work/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/10/25/fooled-again-your-bailout-billions-at-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/10/25/fooled-again-your-bailout-billions-at-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 Christmas came early to US banks, says  the New York Times, when Treasury Secretary Paulson decided to use the first installment of the $700 billion bailout money to recapitalize banks instead of buying up their toxic securities. That would be, he claimed the fastest way to get banks making loans again. If Congress [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://youtube.com/v/0qDuG0ZYD5I"></param><embed src="http://youtube.com/v/0qDuG0ZYD5I" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object><br />
 Christmas came early to US banks, says  <a href = "http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/25/business/25nocera.html?partner=permalink&#038;exprod=permalink">the New York Times</a>, when Treasury Secretary Paulson decided to use the first installment of the $700 billion bailout money to recapitalize banks instead of buying up their toxic securities. That would be, he claimed the fastest way to get banks making loans again. If Congress didn&#8217;t hand over the money at once, recession would hit us! </p>
<p>By October 17, banks had figured out just what to do with all that free money, and <a href = "http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/25/business/25nocera.html?partner=permalink&#038;exprod=permalink">making new loans was not part of their plan</a>. </p>
<p>Is it too late for Congress to rein Paulson in again, just to attach a few strings to the rest of the bailout?<br />
<br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/10/25/fooled-again-your-bailout-billions-at-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five minutes well spent with boy band for Obama</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/10/20/1714/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/10/20/1714/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wide wonderful world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boybama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/10/20/1714/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when you thought this election could not get crazier, it&#8217;s&#8230; BoyBama! 
Funny, warm-hearted, and charming, from the wild and crazy dudes at Portal-A Interactive, who explain:
we decided to make this parody music video in support of the Obama campaign and to show women everywhere that we can shamelessly pander with the best of them.
Thanks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://youtube.com/v/C1dudz3SKjQ"></param><embed src="http://youtube.com/v/C1dudz3SKjQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object><br />Just when you thought this election could not get crazier, it&#8217;s&#8230; BoyBama! </p>
<p>Funny, warm-hearted, and charming, from the wild and crazy dudes at <a href = "http://portal-a.com/">Portal-A Interactive</a>, who explain:<br />
<blockquote>we decided to make this parody music video in support of the Obama campaign and to show women everywhere that we can shamelessly pander with the best of them.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks to the <a href = "http://mamamusings.net/archives/2008/10/17/boybama.php">always awesome Liz Lawley</a> for sharing this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/10/20/1714/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush on the bank crisis: &#8220;Can&#8217;t get fooled again&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/09/22/1697/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/09/22/1697/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wide wonderful world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/09/22/1697/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Winer has an excellent suggestion for the current bank crisis:
So let&#8217;s see the Republicans do a little of that famous Country First stuff.  
Bush and Cheney must resign immediately. No immunity, no pardons. Nancy Pelosi will become President, promising not to run for re-election on November 4. Her term will be one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://youtube.com/v/0qDuG0ZYD5I"></param><embed src="http://youtube.com/v/0qDuG0ZYD5I" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object><br /><a href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/21/weWontGetFooledAgain.html">Dave Winer</a> has an excellent suggestion for the current bank crisis:</p>
<blockquote><p>So let&#8217;s see the Republicans do a little of that famous <i>Country First</i> stuff.  </p>
<p>Bush and Cheney must resign immediately. No immunity, no pardons. Nancy Pelosi will become President, promising not to run for re-election on November 4. Her term will be one of the shortest in US history, just long enough to enact the provisions of the bill being proposed by the Republican administration. If it really is the best thing for the country and not a trick, then the Republicans, being impressed by the seriousness of it, would have to insist that Bush step aside and let the Democrats execute the plan. The entire Bush cabinet stays in office through January 20, but reports, of course to Pelosi. And that includes Paulson. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty simple. If they won&#8217;t do it, we know they&#8217;re bluffing.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re bluffing, but I don&#8217;t think their plan for &#8220;solving&#8221; the current crisis is to save homes and jobs and retirement for small-town America. There are a lot of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/business/22lobby.html?ex=1379822400&#038;en=d9766c390cbb1bbf&#038;ei=5124&#038;partner=permalink&#038;exprod=permalink">big smart guys who know Bush much better than we do who have very big hands out to snitch any government hand out</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/09/22/1697/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In case of danger, give Bush a big blank check?</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/09/22/in-case-of-danger-give-bush-a-big-blank-check/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/09/22/in-case-of-danger-give-bush-a-big-blank-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wide wonderful world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/09/22/in-case-of-danger-give-bush-a-big-blank-check/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Warning signs

Originally uploaded by betsythedevine


Danger, danger, danger! Our country is in trouble, so let&#8217;s give George W Bush a big blank check &#8212; no strings, no accountability &#8212; so that he can make everything right again.
Blank check? America gave Bush a blank check after 9/11. So we ended up with  government-sponsored torture and invasion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/betsythedevine/48530301/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/25/48530301_605285acd3_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/betsythedevine/48530301/">Warning signs</a><br />
<br />
Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/betsythedevine/">betsythedevine</a><br />
</span>
</div>
<p>Danger, danger, danger! Our country is in trouble, so let&#8217;s give George W Bush a big blank check &#8212; no strings, no accountability &#8212; so that he can make everything right again.</p>
<p>Blank check? America gave Bush a blank check after 9/11. So we ended up with  government-sponsored torture and invasion of privacy on a massive scale. What we didn&#8217;t end up with was catching Osama Bin Laden. </p>
<p>Blank check? Congress gave Bush a blank check to go into Iraq if all else failed. Wow that was fast. How many of his cronies are multi-billionaires now on the fat profits they are making there on his watch? What we didn&#8217;t end up with was finding weapon of mass destruction.</p>
<p>Somebody is going to have to help clean up the mess that the unregulated excesses of Wall Street have made. But if we give Bush a blank check on that, who is to say that he&#8217;ll spend the money wisely? Who&#8217;s to say the next president won&#8217;t have to ask for another huge amount of money to get things fixed up?</p>
<p>Even Bush should agree, based on the old Texas saying, &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qDuG0ZYD5I">Fool me, can&#8217;t get fooled again</a>.&#8221; Any big bailout needs to have big strings attached.<br />
<br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/09/22/in-case-of-danger-give-bush-a-big-blank-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama not ready to lead</title>
		<link>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/08/26/obama-not-ready-to-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/08/26/obama-not-ready-to-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Devine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notreadytolead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/08/26/obama-not-ready-to-lead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Obama and Clinton: CNN Texas Debate Mashup

Originally uploaded by stevegarfield


Joe Biden said it.  Hillary Clinton said it. And (I confess) Betsy Devine also thought it, back when the primaries were getting started. Who was this young guy with his groupy supporters, his visions of Red-and-Blue harmony? Wasn&#8217;t he just a naive dreamer who would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevegarfield/2286435880/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3208/2286435880_f4be74d37c_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevegarfield/2286435880/">Obama and Clinton: CNN Texas Debate Mashup</a><br />
<br />
Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/stevegarfield/">stevegarfield</a><br />
</span>
</div>
<p>Joe Biden said it.  Hillary Clinton said it. And (I confess) Betsy Devine also thought it, back when the primaries were getting started. Who was this young guy with his groupy supporters, his visions of Red-and-Blue harmony? Wasn&#8217;t he just a naive dreamer who would quickly be crushed by Karl Rove and his cynical minions?</p>
<p>A <a href = "http://betsydevine.com/blog/2007/05/17/why-do-i-have-a-john-edwards-button/">supporter of John Edwards</a>, I later trended toward Clinton, deeply annoyed by the Hillary-haters who found welcome instead of rebuke among Obama&#8217;s groupies. </p>
<p>But the big-eared guy with the funny name won me over. Making a long story short, he won me over completely, on March 18, with his &#8220;<a href = "http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/18/us/politics/18text-obama.html?ex=1365393600&#038;en=5e45ce5c78f805e7&#038;ei=5124&#038;partner=permalink&#038;exprod=permalink">speech on race</a>,&#8221; giving respect to divisive resentments, both black and white, even as he asserted his own call to unity. </p>
<p>What would it be like, I finally asked myself, to have a President who was thoughtful and empathetic and deeply intelligent. Somebody who stayed loyal to his big-mouthed pastor long after it would be expedient to have denounced him, but somebody who stuck up for what he himself believed in, even when what he believed was a complex reality, not poll-tested bullet points. </p>
<p>Predictably, McCain supporters will use people&#8217;s long-ago words to claim that Obama now is  <a href = "http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/08/republicans-lau.html">not ready to lead</a>. I disagree, and so (I bet) do most of the people they&#8217;ll be deceptively quoting.<br />
<br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://betsydevine.com/blog/2008/08/26/obama-not-ready-to-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
